Chair Lehner, Vice Chair Huffman, Ranking Member Sykes, and
members of the Senate Education Committee:
I am sharing this written testimony in favor of Senate Bill
39 because I believe more accountability is needed for e-schools in Ohio. I
have been in education for the past 14 years as a high school teacher,
part-time college faculty, and now as an Assistant Professor at Southern Utah
University. From November 2013 to November 2014, I worked as a high school
advisor for Ohio Virtual Academy (OHVA hereafter). In addition to my various
teaching and educational experiences, much of my doctoral level research has
focused on Ohio’s charter and virtual/e-schools.
Upon accepting the position at OHVA, I did not hold any
concrete opinions about virtual schools and their operation. I believed at the
time that virtual schools could be excellent opportunities for students who
were unable to attend their local public schools for various reasons. After
working in the school for a year, my opinions drastically changed. As an
advisor, my position required me to manage a caseload of students in order to
track attendance, check grades, and keep open lines of communication with the
family. Advisors were required to check student attendance logs weekly to make
sure families were logging in the required hours per week. If there was a
discrepancy and hours were missing, I contacted the family to alert them of the
missing hours and, if the student had not completed those hours in the system,
discuss a plan to make up hours and complete work that was missing. If the
hours did not get entered, once the student was missing 25 hours of attendance,
I initiated the truancy process by filling out a report and sending it to the
truancy officer and others who oversaw the truancy process. Once the student
was missing 105 hours, as the advisor, I would request the student be withdrawn
for truancy. Again, once initiating this process, the truancy officer and other
individuals processed it.
Shortly before leaving the school in November 2014, there
were 487 K-12th grade students who had not yet logged attendance hours, and
only 89 of those students were currently in the truancy reporting system after
11 weeks of school. There were also 1,826 students who were missing 25 or more
hours of attendance, and of those students, only 594 had begun the truancy
process, amounting to 19% of OHVA students who were eligible for the truancy
process. These numbers also assume that proper truancy reporting was followed
and that families did not alter attendance hours to avoid truancy charges.
During my year working in the school, I found both of these things to be true
at various times.
Despite changes to their reporting process or to the
attendance policy that may have been made at OHVA and similar schools recently,
I believe e-schools should be required to provide
education to each of their students that totals the state-imposed 920 hours.
All of Ohio’s public school students who attend a traditional public school are
required to be in classrooms with their teachers for 920 hours each year, so
e-school students should be held to the same standard. For this to occur in a
way that can be measured, all 920 hours should be spent in the online classroom
platform, which is not currently happening. OHVA’s 2016-2017 Parent Handbook
states:
“Most K-5
Learning Coaches and students spend 50% of their day online and the rest of
their time working off line in workbooks, printed lessons, or other related
activities. Middle school students and Learning Coaches may spend between 60%
and 70% of their time on their computers, while high school students will spend
between 75% and 85% online. Attendance documentation of online and offline work
is required by OHVA parents. Submission of student work samples is required to
demonstrate consistent engagement, and will vary by grade” (p. 3).
Traditional public schools cannot provide 460 hours of
instruction for grades K-5, 644 hours of instruction in middle schools, and 782
hours of instruction at the high school level and make up the remaining hours
with homework. Virtual schools, who academically perform at a much lower level
than the majority of public schools in Ohio, should not be allowed to loosely
interpret the current attendance policies.
Senate Bill 39 would close this gap and provide greater
accountability for virtual schools. If passed, the bill requires the Ohio
Department of Education to be notified of truancy and attendance figures. This
greater accountability places pressure on the virtual schools and their
sponsors to maintain correct attendance records and uphold state policy. These
proposed requirements only serve to benefit the students and families in
virtual schools. Students who are not attending class are not learning to their
full potential, and schools are required to make sure students are in
attendance daily. Traditional public schools take attendance every morning, and
in high schools, each class period. When students attend their classes, the
teachers work to keep them engaged throughout the lesson through constant
interaction and face-to-face engagement that cannot be replicated in an online
classroom despite any technology that may be used. A 2015 study by the Stanford
Center for Research on Education Outcomes (CREDO) found virtual school students
lost 72 days of learning, on average, in reading, and lost 180 days of learning
in math. Low attendance could contribute to this loss of learning.
Virtual schools also need to have greater transparency in
order for the general public to better understand the structures of such
schools and their operation. Virtual school board meetings should be
live-streamed after appropriate notice has been provided statewide in the
cities the virtual school students and their families reside. Parents and the
general public have a right to be able to attend (in person or virtually) each
board meeting, just as if they were attending a board meeting in their local
traditional public school district. Virtual school advertisements, which have
been paid for using taxpayer money funneled from local school districts, should
contain the most recent state report card grades. Taxpayers deserve to
understand what their money is being used for. In a traditional district,
taxpayers have a better understanding of what their taxes are being used for as
they see building improvements happen, hear about new teachers being hired, or
see the new textbooks and curriculum coming home in their child’s backpack each
day. Finally, the state report cards for each virtual school in the state
should contain an area that indicates the school’s mobility rate. While
mobility rates are not an issue solely for virtual schools, the mobility rates
remain higher for virtual schools than many of the traditional public school
districts.
My final point refers to the funding component of SB 39. For
the past 17 years, since the inception of ECOT in 2000, virtual schools have
siphoned money from local school districts. While supporters of virtual schools
may claim that only state funds are transferred from traditional public school
districts to the virtual schools as the money “follows the student,” many Ohio
school districts are subsidizing virtual schools with a portion of local taxpayer
money. In my hometown of Napoleon, the per-pupil funding amount is $4,205;
however, the per-pupil funding amount for ECOT and OHVA is slightly above
$7000. Where does that remaining $2,795 come from? According to The Ohio
Charter School Accountability Project, out of the $237,539 transferred to
charter schools (3 of 4 being virtual schools), $99,562 was through local
taxpayer subsidy. Napoleon Area City taxpayers have been subsidizing virtual
schools who have consistently demonstrated lower academic achievement and
graduation rates than their local district.
I urge you to pass Senate Bill 39 to better serve the
students and families who seek out this type of education. All students in the
state of Ohio are entitled to a quality education. I believe it is our duty to
ensure the proper policies are in place to ensure this for all children. It is
also important that taxpayers understand the structure, operation, and funding
of virtual schools in the state of Ohio.
Chair Lehner and members of the committee-- thank you again
for the opportunity to provide written testimony in favor of Senate Bill 39.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.